Paper questions
Ok, so I changed my topic again and I need some help. I've been looking at the handout we were given on our first day, the one which defines fantasy. It talks about it as a "self-coherent narrative" and discusses the idea of the reader understanding the otherworld and therefore seeing the story as possible in that world. I am going to argue that the stories we have read most recently ("Singing My Sister Down," "The Witch of Truro", and "The Oakthing") fit this definition. They also fit the part that "invites the reader to co-inhabit the tale." To my understanding, this means the reader feels like they understand the setting, the characters feelings, and the reader cares about them. Moreover, these three fit into the second part of the definition (page 2 of the handout) about coming to a realizable ending. Basically, the story seems complete when it is finished. However, the third part of the definition which includes the idea of Tolkien's "eucatastrophe"... happy ending of sorts... seems to only really apply to "The Witch of Truro." Clute says, "tragic fantasy exists, but is uncommon." Do you think the others might be tragic fantasy?
Another part of my paper... According to the "self-coherent" part of the definition, which is the most basic part of Clute's definition, some of Kelly Link's stories might not fit into this definition of fantasy. The reader is kept at a distance and despite the extensive details in some areas, the reader still does not have a clear understanding of the "otherworld" and what is possible there. It is clear that this is part of her intentions... supplying massive details without giving the reader an understanding of her created world.... So by Clute's definition are some of her stories not fantasy?
Another part of my paper... According to the "self-coherent" part of the definition, which is the most basic part of Clute's definition, some of Kelly Link's stories might not fit into this definition of fantasy. The reader is kept at a distance and despite the extensive details in some areas, the reader still does not have a clear understanding of the "otherworld" and what is possible there. It is clear that this is part of her intentions... supplying massive details without giving the reader an understanding of her created world.... So by Clute's definition are some of her stories not fantasy?